Take efficiency, for instance; to improve it, you may have to make the enclosure a bit larger, compromise it's low-end extension, or do a little bit of both. To reduce it's size, you may have to give up some of it's efficiency or bandwidth, and so forth...
[ view entry ] ( 312 views ) | permalink
For a practical answer to this question, try listening to a speaker outside of a box, particularly if it's a low-frequency driver. What you're bound to hear is, in part, the air rushing in and out through the vents beneath the spider or the pole vent and, in part, the difference between the two opposing pressures that the cone generates as it moves back and forth.
The purpose of an enclosure is to either confine or alter one of the pressures by means of delay, resonance, or some degree of the two. Both pressures can be manipulated but only one can be confined. If you consider the ratio between the peak output of a speaker operating in free air and that of one mounted within an enclosure, it becomes evident that the enclosure is chiefly responsible for the system's overall efficiency; it's input to output ratio.
[ view entry ] ( 307 views ) | permalink
Welcome to the Peter W. Kulicki Knowledge Base; an on-line archive documenting personal discovery and theory that has served me throughout many years of enclosure design. As my ideas evolve, so will this archive, and certain entries may be updated to reflect my latest perspective on a given subject.
What you'll find here is not an exurb from any published technical paper, rather my interpretation of the existing and personally derived theory as it applies to the contemporary listening environment. None of the concepts presented here are indisputably set in stone so please don't e-mail me arguing something that I've written as contradictory to your own perception of the science.
[ view entry ] ( 177 views ) | permalink
Calendar
